Esters

Esters v. Vanguard Clinical, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20233:23-cv-00820California4,606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELICIA ESTERS a/k/a ESTERS TRIAL Case No.: 23-cv-00820-AJB-JLB

MANAGEMENT FIRM, LLC,

12 Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT BEACON HILL v.

STAFFING GROUP, LLC’S MOTION

14 VANGUARD CLINICAL, INC., and TO DISMISS BEACON HILL STAFFING GROUP, LLC, (Doc. No. 12) 16 Defendant. 17 Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Beacon Hill Staffing Group’s (“Beacon Hill”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Felicia Esters a/k/a Esters Trial Management Firm, LLC’s (“ETMF”) Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(3), and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 12.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 14), to which Beacon Hill replied, (Doc. No. 15). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the instant matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint as to Beacon Hill. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.