Clay

Clay v. San Diego Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20233:23-cv-00360California4,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KENNETH WAYNE CLAY, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00360-JAH-MMP Inmate #1225729,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 12 vs. (1) DISMISSING SECOND 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF No.

18] PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT;

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND § 1915A(b); and EL CAJON POLICE DEPARTMENT;

EDWIN C. MILLER; PAUL J. PFINGST,

(2) DENYING MOTION TO Defendants. COMPEL RULING, MOTION FOR

RULING AND ORDER, MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL, MOTION TO

COMPEL, AND MOTION FOR

19 SERVICE [ECF Nos. 19–23]

21 On February 22, 2023, Kenneth Wayne Clay (“Plaintiff” or “Clay”) filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a Motion to Proceed to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. See ECF Nos. 1–4. The Court granted Clay’s IFP Motion, denied his Motion to Appoint Counsel, and dismissed his Complaint without prejudice for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.