Rademaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 David RADEMAKER, Case No.: 21-cv-1757-AGS-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING THIRD

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

Andrew GANZEKAUFER, et al.,

AND DENYING OTHER MOTIONS

Defendants. (ECF 33) 9 In his third amended complaint,1 plaintiff David Rademaker claims that the currently named defendants failed to protect him from assault, retaliated against him, and interfered with his access to the courts. (ECF 33, at 6–23.) Because this latest complaint fails to state a claim, and because it is now clear Rademaker is unable to cure the recurring pleading defects, this action is dismissed without further leave to amend. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A SCREENING A. Standard of Review The Court must conduct an initial review of “all complaints ‘in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.’” Chavez v. Robinson, 817 F.3d 1162, 1168…