Abrogina

Abrogina v. Kentech Consulting, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20233:16-cv-00662California3,957 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VIRGINIA ABROGINA, as an Case No.: 16cv0662 DMS (WVG) individual, and on behalf of the putative 12 class, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT

14 v. 15 KENTECH CONSULTING, INC., a foreign corporation doing business in California; 17 BACKGROUNDCHECKS.COM, a limited liability company doing business in California; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion, and Defendant filed a reply. For the reasons set out below, the motion is denied. / / / / / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND In January 2014, Plaintiff Virginia Abrogina applied for a job at Alere, Inc.. (Second Am. Complaint (“SAC”) ¶ 36, ECF No. 42.) Alere referred Plaintiff to a staffing agency, Suna Solutions, Inc., to complete the hiring process. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.