Cruz
Cruz v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIANA CRUZ, Case No.: 23-cv-874-L-KSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY
v. MOTION [Doc. No. 40]
NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.,
15 Defendants.
17 The parties’ Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute is before the 18 Court. See Doc. No. 40 (the “Joint Motion”). Plaintiff seeks an order compelling defendant 19 to respond to (1) plaintiff’s interrogatory numbers 4, 5, 18, and 22; and (2) plaintiff’s 20 request for production numbers 2, 8, 11, 12, 13, 16, and 21. See id. at 4-6. The parties also 21 dispute whether defendant must produce a witness prepared to testify about certain topics 22 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6). See id. at 5-6. 23 The discovery process should, in theory, be cooperative and require little to no 24 supervision from the Court. Sali v. Corono Reg’l Med. Ctr., 884 F.3d 1218, 1219 (9th Cir. 25 2018). However, a party seeking discovery may move the Court to issue an order 26 compelling…