Bowell

Bowell v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20233:23-cv-01234California2,118 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES BOWELL, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01234-LL-AHG

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY

HEARING

MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. [ECF No. 27] 16 Before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing Revisiting Prior Convictions CDCR-BPH Used 9/28/2021 (“Motion for Evidentiary Hearing”). ECF No. 27. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Petitioner James Bowell, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on March 2, 2023, challenging his state court conviction for failure to register as a sex offender and resulting sentence of 25 years to life under California’s Three Strikes Law. ECF No. 1. Respondent filed an Answer to the Petition on September 21, 2023, and Petitioner filed a Traverse on September 29, 2023. ECF Nos. 23, 25. On October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.