Clinton

Clinton v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20233:23-cv-00119California891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKEITH CLINTON, Case No.: 3:23-cv-0119-DMS-DEB

CDCR #AY1315

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

ACTION FOR FAILING TO Plaintiff,

STATE A CLAIM AND FAILING

14 v. TO PROSECUTE

M. POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, S.

STEADMAN, ASHBURY, CORTEZ,

NAHN, CRUZ, C. MOORE, DOES 1-10,

18 Defendants. 19 20 On January 20, 2023, Markeith Clinton (“Plaintiff” of “Clinton”), a state inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. The Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP motion and dismissed his Complaint without prejudice. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was informed of the pleading deficiencies of his Complaint and granted leave to file an amended complaint. See id. He further notified that if he failed to timely amend, the Court would enter a final judgment of dismissal based on his failure to state a claim and his failure to prosecute in compliance with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.