Schneider

Schneider v. Molina

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20233:22-cv-01666California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JULIE SCHNIEDER, Case No.: 22-cv-1666-CAB-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

ALICIA MOLINA, et al, [Doc. No. 35] Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Julie Schneider filed this action on October 26, 2022, alleging the wrongful foreclosure of her home at 9272 Brookside Circle, Spring Valley, CA. The Court dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff’s sole federal claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) on January 26, 2023. Plaintiff has since filed multiple documents not in compliance with the local rules, which were rejected by the Court. Plaintiff now files a motion for reconsideration, presumably under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), and asks the court to issue default judgment on Defendants Nestor Trustee Services, Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Stan Moskowitz, and Stanly Middleman. “The moving party under Rule 60(b) is entitled to relief from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.