Limpin

Limpin v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20233:23-cv-00399California1,501 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES ex rel. MELCHOR Case No.: 23-cv-0399-DMS-AGS

KARL T. LIMPIN,

ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL; v. AND (2) GRANTING THE UNITED

STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Melchor Karl T. Limpin’s First Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 7), Request for Judicial Notice, (ECF No. 8), Motion for Pro Bono Counsel, (ECF No. 11), United States’ Notice of Election to Decline to Intervene, (ECF No. 16), Plaintiff’s Motion for Compulsory Joinder (ECF No. 17), United States’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 24), Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Effect Service of Process by the U.S. Marshal (ECF No. 25), and Plaintiff’s Motion to Disqualify Assistant U.S. Attorney (ECF No. 27.) I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Relator Melchor Karl T. Limpin, proceeding pro se, brings this qui tam…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.