Simmons

Simmons v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20233:20-cv-01068California3,388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROLAND S., Case No.: 3:20-cv-01068-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR

v.

ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting 42 U.S.C. § 1383(d)(2)(B) Commissioner of Social Security, 15 [ECF No. 29] Defendant. 16 17 Before the Court is Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383(d)(2)(B), filed by Plaintiff’s counsel Steven G. Rosales on September 7, 2023. ECF No. 29. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Roland S. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on June 11, 2020, seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of his application for supplemental security income. ECF No. 1. The parties consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge on April 8, 2021. ECF Nos. 9, 18. After the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) filed the administrative record in lieu of an answer, the Court issued a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.