In Re: Mamady Cisse

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20233:23-cv-01781California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE Case No.: 23-CV-1781-JO-JLB

CISSE,

12 Debtor. ORDER: (1) DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND (2) DISMISSING

MAMADY CISSE, ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY

THE REQUIRED FILING FEE BY 28 Appellant, U.S.C. § 1914(a) 16 v.

THOMAS BILLINGSLEA; DEUTSCHE

BANK NATIONAL TRUST

COMPANY,

19 Appellees. 20

Pro se appellant Mamady Cisse filed a bankruptcy appeal. Dkt. 1. He did not pay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and has instead filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 2. A party may institute a civil action without prepaying the required filing fee if the Court grants leave to proceed IFP based on indigency. 28 U.S.C. § 1915; Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007). Plaintiffs in the Southern District of California seeking to proceed IFP must establish their inability to pay by filing an affidavit …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.