Bueno

Bueno v. Merck & Co., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20233:22-cv-00522California3,456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SPENCER BUENO, an individual, and Case No.: 3:22-cv-00522-H-BLM RICHARD PARKER, an individual,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF v. SPENCER BUENO’S CLAIMS FOR

LACK OF PERSONAL

MERCK & CO., INC., a New Jersey JURISDICTION Corporation; MERCK SHARP &

DOHME CORP., a New Jersey [Doc. No. 62.] Corporation; ORGANON & CO., a 17 Delaware Corporation; ORGANON LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 19 Defendants.

21 On July 20, 2023, Defendants Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”), Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC1 (“MSD”), Organon & Co., and Organon LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Spencer Bueno’s (“Bueno”) claims for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 62.) On August 7, 2023, Bueno filed a response in opposition to

1 Plaintiffs Spencer Bueno and Richard Parker named Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.