Brady

Brady v. Grimm

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20233:22-cv-01523California2,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSEPH BRADY, Case No.: 22-CV-1523-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v. AND MOTION TO STRIKE

MATT GRIMM et al., [Doc. Nos. 16-18, 22, 23, 34, 38, 39, 40] Defendants. 15 This matter is before the Court on an array of motions by both sides, including three motions to dismiss, one motion to strike, and three motions for judicial notice. The motions are all fully briefed, and the Court deems them suitable for submission without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the motions to dismiss are granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. I. Procedural History On September 8, 2021, pro se Plaintiff Joseph Brady filed the complaint in Case No. 21-CV-1583-CAB-AHG (the “First Action”) in this court, against various private entities, federal and local governments and government agencies, and federal employees, including most of the defendants in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.