Tipoo

Tipoo v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20233:23-cv-01246California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOHAMMED A. TIPOO, Case No. 23-cv-1246-BAS-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 10)

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT,

INC.

15 Defendant. 16 Before this Court is the parties’ request to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41. (ECF No. 10.) Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary judgment, see Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared, see Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). See also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is effective upon the filing of a compliant notice or stipulation. No court order is required. See Stone v. Woodford, CIV-F-05-845 AWI-DLB, 2007 WL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.