Turner

Turner v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20233:23-cv-01771California3,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE TURNER, Case No.: 23-cv-1771-WQH-JLB individually and on behalf of the Proposed Claim, and victims of ORDER the allegations & charges, and The People of The United States of America, Plaintiff, v. LUXOTITICA RETAIL NORTH AMERICA, INC., DBA LENS

CRAFTERS, ZENNI OPTICAL,

GLASSES.COM, AND OTHER

UNKNOWN MISCELLANEOUS

COMPANIES; ZENNI OPTICAL;

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; FBI – SAN

DIEGO FIELD OFFICE;

USSOCOM; FBI; CIA; SECRET SERVICE; IRS; SEC; and DHS, 24 Defendants. 25 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 2) filed by Plaintiff Terrance Turner. I. BACKGROUND On September 25, 2023, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a Complaint against Luxotitica Retail North America, Inc., dba Lens Crafters, Zenni Optical, Glasses.com, and Other Unknown Miscellaneous Companies; Zenni Optical; Federal Trade Commission; FBI – San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.