Murphy v. Roblox Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20233:23-cv-01940California1,527 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KATHERINE MURPHY, MONIQUE Case No.: 23-CV-1940 TWR (BLM) PAYAN, DAMIEN UHL, and those 12 similarly situated, ORDER (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION REGARDING BRIEFING Plaintiffs,

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S

14 v. ANTICIPATED MOTION TO DISMISS; AND ROBLOX CORPORATION, a Delaware (2) FOR PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW corporation,

CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

Defendant. SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN

DIEGO

20 (ECF Nos. 1, 7)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Katherine Murphy, Monique Payan, and Damnien Uhl’s First Amended Class Action Complaint for Damages (“FACAC,” ECF No. 1-2), which Defendant Roblox Corporation removed from the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). (See generally ECF No. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.