Allison

Nelson v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20233:22-cv-00377California2,385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATASHA HILDA NELSON, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00377-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al.,

MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE

Defendants. LIMITATION [ECF No. 44],

16 (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PLRA SCREENING [ECF No. 46], and

(3) NOTIFYING DEFENDANTS OF

OPPORTUNITY TO CONSENT

21 22 23 24 Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Exceed Page Limitations for her Second Amended Complaint, and (2) Defendants’ Motion for Screening of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). ECF Nos. 44, 46. The Court will address each in turn. I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION Civil Local Rule 8.2(a) provides that complaints filed by prisoners pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 must be “legibly written or typewritten on forms supplied by the court,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.