Arellano

Arellano v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20233:20-cv-00228California2,704 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00228-RBM-LR

CDCR #AH-1995,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR COSTS TO BE vs. REDUCED

JONES, SIHOTANG, DR. MARTIN,

[Doc. 83] SANTILLAN, and C.D.C.R, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 This case involves Plaintiff Raul Arellano’s (“Plaintiff”) Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendants R. Santillan, B. Martin, O. Sihotang, and F. Jones (“Defendants”), medical officials at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, where Plaintiff is imprisoned. (Doc. 6, First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).) On June 28, 2023, the Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety and entered judgment on their behalf. (Docs. 75, 76.) Following the Court’s entry of summary judgment in their favor, Defendants filed their Bill of Costs, Memorandum of Costs, and Affidavit of Defense Counsel in Support 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.