Scriber

Scriber v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20233:22-cv-01716California8,062 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MICHAEL SCRIBER, et al., individually Case No. 22-cv-1716-MMA-AHG and on behalf all others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

Plaintiffs, FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S v. MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. [Doc. No. 21] 17 18 19 20 Plaintiffs Michael Scriber, Stacy Powell, Doug Harrigan, and Susan Wisner Phillips (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Ford Motor Company (“Defendant” or “Ford”). See Doc. No. 20 (“Second Amended Complaint” or “SAC”). On June 29, 2023, Ford filed a motion to compel arbitration. See Doc. No. 21. Plaintiffs filed an opposition, to which Ford replied. See Doc. Nos. 25, 26. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 23. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Ford’s motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.