Sihler

Sihler v. The Fulfillment Lab, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20233:20-cv-01528California2,041 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANET SIHLER, Individually and On Case No.: 20cv1528-LL-DDL Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated; 12 CHARLENE BAVENCOFF, Individually ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND and On Behalf of All Others Similarly, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR COURT APPROVAL

Plaintiffs,

OF PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE

v. PLAN

THE FULFILLMENT LAB, INC; [ECF No. 194]

RICHARD NELSON; BEYOND

GLOBAL, INC.; BRIGHTREE

HOLDINGS CORP.; BMOR GLOBAL

LLC; DAVID FLYNN; RICKIE JOE

JAMES,

20 Defendants. 21 22 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for approval of their proposed class notice plan. ECF No. 194. No opposition to the Motion was filed. The Court deems the Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 28 I. BACKGROUND On March 7, 2022, Plaintiffs filed the operative complaint, which is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.