Brinker
Brinker v. Axos Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER BREAR BRINKER, Case No. 22-cv-386-MMA-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
AXOS BANK, et al.,
Defendants. [Doc. No. 45] 16 17 18 Plaintiff Jennifer Brear Brinker (“Plaintiff”) has filed a Third Amended Complaint against Defendants Axos Bank and John Tolla (collectively, “Defendants”). See Doc. No. 44 (“Third Amended Complaint” or “TAC”). Defendants now move to dismiss Plaintiff’s first cause of action, retaliation in violation of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (“SOX”), 18 U.S.C. § 1514A. See Doc. No. 45. Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion,1 to which Defendants replied. See Doc. Nos. 46, 47. The Court 25 26 1 Plaintiff is once again reminded that “the Civil Local Rules require that briefs, including footnotes, be ‘no smaller than 14-point standard font (e.g. Times New Roman).’” Doc. No. 43 at 1 fn.1 (quoting 28 found the matter…