Morton

Morton v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20233:21-cv-01428California720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN MORTON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-1428-MMA-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER OVERRULING

v. DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN

DIEGO’S RULE 72 OBJECTION

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 149] 16 17 18 On September 20, 2023, Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner issued a Discovery Order granting in part Plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of documents. See Doc. No. 144. Defendant County of San Diego (the “County”) now objects to portions of the Discovery Order. See Doc. No. 149. Plaintiffs have filed a response in opposition to the objection, to which the County replied. See Doc. Nos. 156, 163. For the reasons set forth below, the Court OVERRULES the County’s objection. Pursuant to Rule 72(a), a party may object to a non-dispositive pretrial order of a magistrate judge within fourteen days of service of the order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). District court review of magistrate judge orders on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.