Sandoval

Sandoval v. San Diego, County of

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20233:16-cv-01004California7,864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANA SANDOVAL, et al., Case No.: 3:16-cv-01004-BEN-AGS

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF Nos. 80-93] 16 Plaintiff Ana Sandoval, individually and as successor in interest to Ronnie Sandoval, along with Ronnie Sandoval, Jr., and Josiah Sandoval (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 following the in- custody death of Ronnie Sandoval (“Sandoval”) while he was detained at the San Diego Central Jail. ECF No. 1. Plaintiffs allege that during Sandoval’s confinement, County of San Diego (“County”) and employees Romeo de Guzman, Dana Harris, and Maria Llamado (collectively, “Nurse Defendants”) were deliberately indifferent to Sandoval’s serious medical needs and liable for his wrongful death. Id. On July 24, 2023, Plaintiffs and Defendants submitted a total of fourteen motions in limine. See ECF Nos. 80-93. Both parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.