Garcia

Garcia v. Hertz Local Edition Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20233:23-cv-01270California2,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEONARDO GARCIA, an individual, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01270-BEN-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

HERTZ LOCAL EDITION CORP., a

Delaware Corporation; MELISSA 15 LINDEN, an individual; and DOES

through 20, inclusive, [ECF No. 4] Defendants.

18 On June 28, 2023, Plaintiff Leonardo Garcia (“Plaintiff”) filed a civil complaint in 19 the California Superior Court against Defendants Hertz Local Edition Corp., Melissa 20 Linden and twenty “Doe” Defendants alleging sixteen state law claims. ECF No. 1. On 21 July 10, 2023, Defendant Hertz removed the action to this Court based on diversity 22 jurisdiction. Id. 23 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. ECF No. 4. Defendant Hertz 24 opposes the motion. ECF No. 7. No reply was filed. The briefing was submitted on the 25 papers without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and Rule 78(b) of 26 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 8. After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.