Hamerslag
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Hamerslag
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE Case No.: 23-CV-780 JLS (AHG)
COMPANY,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART, PURSUANT TO v. CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7.1(f)(3)(c),
PERSPECTIUM CORPORATION’S
STEVEN HAMERSLAG and MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY
PERSPECTIUM CORP.,
OF DEFAULT OR,
16 Defendants. ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS
18 (ECF Nos. 4, 7, 8) 19 Presently before the Court is Defendant Perspectium Corporation’s (“Perspectium”) Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default or, Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.,” ECF No. 8). Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company did not file a response to the Motion. See generally Docket. On August 4, 2023, the Court took the Motion under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 12. Having carefully considered Perspectium’s arguments and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS…