Brockman

Brockman v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20233:22-cv-00512California3,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 22CV512-AGS(BLM) CHANDA BROCKMAN AND JUAN CARLOS

LOMELI,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION TO COMPEL PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED DOCUMENTS/THINGS v. 13 [ECF NO. 53]

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, JASON MARCUSEN,

DEPUTY GREEN #7131, AND SERGEANT

ALLISTER #7026,

15 Defendants. 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ October 9, 2023 Motion to Compel Previously Identified Documents/Things [ECF No. (“Mot.”)] and Defendants’ October 16, 2023 opposition to the motion [ECF No. 54 (“Oppo.”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. FACUTAL BACKGROUND On May 7, 2021, Plaintiffs left work and stopped at the Napa Auto Parts Store. ECF No. 30 (“Consol. Comp.”). Plaintiff Lomeli entered the store, purchased transmission fluid, and left. Id. at 3. Around that same time, a purse was reported stolen from an unoccupied vehicle. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.