Satariano

Satariano v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20233:21-cv-00548California1,995 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 21cv548-BLM WENDY J. SATARIANO,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO

v. U.S.C. § 406(b)

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL [ECF No. 23]

SECURITY,

14 Defendant.

16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s September 21, 2023, Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [ECF No. 23 (“Mot.”)] and Defendant’s October 5, 2023 response [ECF No. 24 (“Response”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND On March 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security, seeking judicial review of the denial of her “application for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits.” ECF No. 1. On November 1, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Motion for Voluntary Remand. ECF No. 17. On November 3, 2021, the Court granted the parties’ motion. ECF No. 18. On December 20, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.