Morneau

Morneau v. Protective Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20233:22-cv-01861California1,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CRISTIN MORNEAU, individually; Case No.: 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG KELLY STRANGE, individually; AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT Cristin Morneau and Kelly Strange,

MOTION TO EXTEND FACT

jointly as successors-in-interest to

DISCOVERY DEADLINES

Carolyn A. Morneau and on behalf of the

ESTATE OF CAROLYN A. MORNEAU,

[ECF No. 35] 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v.

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY, Defendant. 21 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF No. 35. The parties seek an order from the Court extending their deadline to raise a discovery dispute and extending the fact discovery deadline by approximately two weeks. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 30 at 7 (amended scheduling order, stating that “[t]he dates set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.