Morneau
Morneau v. Protective Life Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CRISTIN MORNEAU, individually; Case No.: 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG KELLY STRANGE, individually; AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT Cristin Morneau and Kelly Strange,
MOTION TO EXTEND FACT
jointly as successors-in-interest to
DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Carolyn A. Morneau and on behalf of the
ESTATE OF CAROLYN A. MORNEAU,
[ECF No. 35] 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v.
PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY, Defendant. 21 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF No. 35. The parties seek an order from the Court extending their deadline to raise a discovery dispute and extending the fact discovery deadline by approximately two weeks. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 30 at 7 (amended scheduling order, stating that “[t]he dates set forth…