ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 IMPRIMISRX, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY (ECF No. 166); OSRX, INC.; OCULAR SCIENCE, INC.,

Defendants. AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT

17 TESTIMONY (ECF No. 174) 18 19 Before the Court are two Daubert motions by the parties to exclude expert testimony. (ECF Nos. 166, 174.) Defendants OSRX, Inc. and Ocular Science, Inc. filed a Daubert motion to exclude Plaintiff’s four proposed experts Mark Keegan, Sarah Butler, Dr. Kenneth Schell, and Dr. Robert Wunderlich. (ECF No. 166.) Plaintiff ImprimisRx, LLC filed a Daubert motion to exclude the testimony of Defendants’ expert Dr. Alyson Wooten. (ECF Nos. 174.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the parties’ motions. 26 27 28 BACKGROUND On July 20, 2021, Plaintiff commenced this action…