Blackgold

Blackgold v. Madison

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20233:23-cv-01740California1,181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SUTEN BLACKGOLD, aka Mitchell Case No. 23-CV-1740-JLS (DDL) Quentin Grady,

CDCR #AS-8775, ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff, AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); 13 v. AND (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING

PATRICIA MADISON, et al.,

FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C.

Defendants. § 1914(a)

17 (ECF Nos. 1, 2) 18 Plaintiff Suten Blackgold (“Blackgold” or “Plaintiff”), also known as Mitchell Quentin Grady, currently incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP”), has filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff did not prepay the full civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s IFP Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.