Whited
Whited v. Young
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20233:23-cv-01299California2,258 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:23-cv-1299-JES-MSB
AARON JAMES WHITED,
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA v. PAUPERIS [ECF No 6.] and
YOUNG, ELIZABTH HACKET,
(2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION AS
ADAM LANGKOWSKI, JESUS
FRIVOLOUS PURUSANT TO
MANABAT, U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) Defendants. 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION On July 7, 2023, Plaintiff, Aaron James Whited (“Plaintiff” or “Whited”), an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. On August 14, 2023, the Court dismissed the action because Whited had not prepaid the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and had not filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 4. In its Order, the Court gave Whited 45 days to either pay the fee or move to proceed IFP.…