McCoy

McCoy v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20233:22-cv-02075California1,622 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARBARA MCCOY, Case No.: 22-CV-2075 JLS (SBC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY

FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.;

DISLOSING DR. STEPHEN LI AS A

DEPUY PRODUCTS, INC.;

FACT WITNESS

DEPUY SYNTHES, INC.;

JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JOHNSON (ECF No. 114) & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.; and

JOHNSON & JOHNSON

INTERNATIONAL, Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Barbara McCoy’s Motion to Reopen Discovery for the Limited Purpose of Disclosing Dr. Stephen Li as a Fact Witness (“Mot.,” ECF No. 114-1). Defendants DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.; DePuy Products, Inc.; DePuy Synthes, Inc.; Johnson & Johnson; Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.; and Johnson & Johnson International’s (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n, ECF No. 115), to which Plaintiff submitted a Reply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.