McCoy
McCoy v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARBARA MCCOY, Case No.: 22-CV-2075 JLS (SBC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY
FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.;
DISLOSING DR. STEPHEN LI AS A
DEPUY PRODUCTS, INC.;
FACT WITNESS
DEPUY SYNTHES, INC.;
JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JOHNSON (ECF No. 114) & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.; and
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
INTERNATIONAL, Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Barbara McCoy’s Motion to Reopen Discovery for the Limited Purpose of Disclosing Dr. Stephen Li as a Fact Witness (“Mot.,” ECF No. 114-1). Defendants DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.; DePuy Products, Inc.; DePuy Synthes, Inc.; Johnson & Johnson; Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.; and Johnson & Johnson International’s (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n, ECF No. 115), to which Plaintiff submitted a Reply…