Ashford

Ashford v. Mattar

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20233:23-cv-00340California1,444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BURK N. ASHFORD, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00340-RBM-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. PETITION FOR

RECONSIDERATION OF MOTION

LEE MATTAR, et al.,

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

Defendants. PAUPERIS

16 [Doc. 4] 17 I. INTRODUCTION On February 21, 2023, Plaintiff Burk N. Ashford (“Plaintiff”) filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus Review from California Supreme Court Denial (“Petition”). (Doc. 1.) The caption of the Petition names as a Defendants “Lee Mattar aka Leroy Mattar, the Mattar Family Trust et al, & dba Lee’s Automotive & Does 1-20...” (Id. at 1.1) However, the Petition appears to be an attempt to appeal or challenge a decision by the California Supreme Court regarding the timeliness of an appeal of a lower court’s denial of a motion to strike an exhibit—an unpublished federal court decision. (See id. at 2–9.) Plaintiff’s 26 27 28 underlying issue in the state court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.