Arline

Arline v. Cornejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20233:22-cv-00284California7,132 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH D. ARLINE, JR., Case No.: 22cv284-DMS(LR) CDCR #T-13192 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SPOLIATION

v.

SANCTIONS

I. CORNEJO, et al., [ECF No. 42] Defendants. 17 On September 25, 2023, Plaintiff Keith D. Arline, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), an incarcerated person proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed a “Motion Requesting Sanctions for Defendants[’] Spoliation of Evidence” regarding video and document evidence that Plaintiff contends was improperly destroyed or tampered with during the pendency of this case. (See ECF No. 42 (“Mot. for Sanctions”).) After the Court issued a briefing schedule, Defendants I. Cornejo, J. Garcia, D. Baeza, and S. Avalos (“Defendants”) timely filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion. (See Defs.’ Opp’n to Pl.’s Mot. for Sanctions, ECF No. 45 (“Opp’n”).) Plaintiff subsequently filed a Reply to Defendants’ Opposition, and the undersigned held a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.