Mehboob Shah v. Desert Auto Group V LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20233:23-cv-01073California1,916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 BILAL MEHBOOB SHAH, Case No.: 23cv1073-JO-BGS 9 Plaintiff, 10 v.

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

COMPLAINT

DESERT AUTO GROUP V LLC,

13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 On October 10, 2023, pro se Plaintiff Bilal Mehboob Shah filed an amended complaint alleging that his former employer, Defendant Desert Auto Group V LLC (“Desert Auto”), both discriminated and retaliated against him in violation of employment laws. Dkt. 15 (“Am. Compl.”). Upon screening the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court dismisses his complaint as untimely. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff claims that Desert Auto discriminated against him and then unlawfully terminated him in retaliation for requesting accommodations. See id. at 4. Plaintiff, a Pakistani male, began working for Desert Auto as a sales manager on or around September 21, 2021. Id. His manager mistreated him by yelling at him, throwing things around him, and slamming the table when speaking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.