Andrews

Azenta, Inc. v. Andrews

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20233:22-cv-01952California3,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Introduction 20 Azenta seeks to reward all sales team members with performance incentive to 21 achieve sales objectives. This document provides an overview of the FY2022 Sales Incentive Plan for all eligible Sales team members. The plan is effective for sales closed from October 1st, 2021 through September 30th, 2022. As 23 with all incentive plans, management reserves the right to modify the plan at any time and evaluate any transaction on a case-by-case basis. Terms and Conditions 26 1. This plan supersedes all prior sales compensation programs of the company and all other previous or written statements from all previous entities regarding the subjects contained herein unless amended in writing 28 “had decided to treat the sale as a ‘house account,’ which meant Andrews would not receive the associated incentive award.” (Id.) On April 1, 2022, Andrews tendered her resignation, and her last day of employment with Plaintiff was April 15, 2022. (Compl. ¶ 4.) On December 9, 2022, Plaintiff filed its complaint alleging, inter alia, that Andrews violated the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 by downloading and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.