Alexander
Alexander v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO J. ALEXANDER, Case No.: 23-cv-617-DMS-BLM
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Wells Fargo Bank’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff filed an opposition, (ECF No. 11), and Wells Fargo Bank (“Defendant”) filed a reply (ECF No. 12). The Court previously granted in part and denied in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss the original complaint (ECF No. 8), which raised the same claims as the current operative complaint. The Court provided Plaintiff leave to amend the dismissed claims, and Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. 26 27 28 I. …