Tracy
Tracy v. 1835 Columbia Street LP
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK CHRISTOPHER TRACY, Case No.: 23-cv-2066-RSH-AHG
Plaintiff,
ORDER REMANDING CASE
v. 1835 COLUMBIA STREET LP, Defendant. 16 On November 9, 2023, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause, ordering the Parties to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 3. The Court’s OSC noted that Defendant filed a notice of removal based on diversity jurisdiction. The Court explained that it was unable to determine the Parties’ respective states of citizenship based on the record before it and that the forum defendant rule under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2) may apply.1 On November 30, 2023, Defendant filed a response to the Court’s OSC. ECF No. 4. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed a response. 25
28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2) provides that an action “may not be removed if any of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in 28 …