Epperson

Epperson v. General Motors, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20233:23-cv-01554California3,949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 JAMES EPPERSON Case No.: 3:23-cv-01554-W-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND [DOCS. 10 and 11] GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, a limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 17 10, inclusive, Defendants. 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff James Epperson’s motion ([Docs. 10 and 111] “Motion”) to remand this case to the San Diego Superior Court. Defendant opposes ([Doc. 15] “Opposition”). Plaintiff has failed to reply. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion. //

27 1 Plaintiff James Epperson has filed two motions to remand [Docs. 10 and 11]. The two motions 28 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This case arises from Plaintiff James Epperson’s alleged purchase2 of a 2020 Chevrolet Bolt (the “Vehicle”) from one of General Motors, LLC’s (“Defendant”) “authorized…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.