Tarkett

Tarkett v. USAA General Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20233:23-cv-01724California396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH TARKETT, individually and Case No.: 3:23-cv-01724-H-BLM on behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT v. 14 [Doc. No. 12.]

USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY

15 COMPANY, a Texas Corporation, Defendant. 17 On September 18, 2023, Plaintiff Joseph Tarkett (“Plaintiff”) filed a putative class action complaint against Defendant USAA General Indemnity Company (“Defendant”), alleging claims for: (1) breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (2) violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq.; (3) breach of fiduciary duty; (4) conversion; (5) declaratory relief; and (6) unjust enrichment. (Doc. No. 1.) On November 6, 2023, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 12.) On November 27, 2023, in lieu of filing an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.