Fate Therapeutics, Inc. v. Shoreline Biosciences, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20233:22-cv-00676California1,612 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FATE THERAPEUTICS, INC.; and Case No.: 22-cv-00676-H-MSB
WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF Plaintiffs,
SUPERSEDEAS BOND AND TO
14 v. STAY THE EXECUTION AND ENFORCEMENT OF COSTS
SHORELINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.,
AWARD
Defendant. [Doc. No. 439.]
18 On November 17, 2023, Plaintiffs Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (“Fate”) and Whitehead 19 Institute for Biomedical Research (“Whitehead”) filed a motion for approval of a 20 supersedeas bond and to stay the execution and enforcement of the Court’s costs award. 21 (Doc. No. 439.) On November 20, 2023, the Court took Plaintiffs’ motion under 22 submission. (Doc. No. 441.) On December 1, 2023, Defendant Shoreline Biosciences, 23 Inc. (“Shoreline”) filed a non-opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion. (Doc. No. 443.) For the 24…