Tibrio, LLC v. Flex Marketing, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20233:23-cv-01167California1,817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIBRIO, LLC, Case No.: 23cv1167-LL-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE OCTOBER 30, 2023

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

FLEX MARKETING, LLC,

Defendant. 16 17 Before the Court’s is Plaintiff’s Response to the Court’s October 30, 2023 Order to Show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the amount in controversy does not exceed the threshold required for diversity jurisdiction. ECF No. 34; see also ECF No. 33. Plaintiff also seeks leave to amend its complaint. ECF No. 34. I. BACKGROUND On October 12, 2023, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) claiming the Court has diversity jurisdiction over this matter.1 ECF No. 29 ¶ 12. The TAC 26 27 1 Plaintiff incorrectly refers to the operative complaint as the Second Amended Complaint. 28 alleges that Defendant violated California’s Unfair Competition Laws…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.