ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20233:21-cv-01305California419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IMPRIMISRX, LLC, Case No.: 21-cv-1305-BAS-DDL

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO DE-DESIGNATE

DOCUMENTS WRONGFULLY

OSRX, INC.; OCULAR SCIENCE, INC., DESIGNATED AS CONFIDENTIAL

15 Defendants. [Dkt. No. 181]

17 On November 30, 2023, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to De- Designate Documents (“Motion”) under the operative Protective Order. Dkt. No. 181. Keith J. Wesley and George Laiolo appeared for Plaintiff. Allie M. Fellows and Thomas J. Martin appeared for Defendants. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court DENIES the Motion without prejudice. Judge Major previously denied Plaintiff’s first motion to de-designate ten of the documents at issue in the instant Motion, and no changed circumstances warrant reconsideration of that decision. See Dkt. No. 54. Further, the parties agree that all of the documents at issue in the instant Motion are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.