Ritchie

Ritchie v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20233:23-cv-02163California1,560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOAQUIN RITCHIE, Case No.: 23-CV-2163 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

ALLYSON HILL and GOLDEN

DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT

CREDIT UNION,

PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS, AND Defendants. (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

18 (ECF Nos. 1, 2)

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Joaquin Ritchie’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) and Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Appl.,” ECF No. 2). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s submissions and the applicable law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s IFP Application and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint. DISCUSSION All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.