Ritchie
Ritchie v. Hill
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20233:23-cv-02163California1,560 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOAQUIN RITCHIE, Case No.: 23-CV-2163 JLS (BLM)
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
ALLYSON HILL and GOLDEN
DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT
CREDIT UNION,
PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS, AND Defendants. (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
18 (ECF Nos. 1, 2)
Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Joaquin Ritchie’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) and Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Appl.,” ECF No. 2). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s submissions and the applicable law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s IFP Application and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint. DISCUSSION All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the…