Ramirez

Ramirez v. Pratt

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20233:23-cv-02175California1,306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN PONCE RAMIREZ, Case No.: 23-CV-2175 JLS (KSC)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE GLEN E. PRATT, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Martin Ponce Ramirez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Pet.,” ECF No. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his state court conviction in San Diego Superior Court case number SCN398344. FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT A petition for writ of habeas corpus must either be accompanied by a $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See CivLR 4.5. Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee and has not moved to proceed IFP. See generally Docket. To proceed with this action, Petitioner must submit a copy of this Order with the requisite $5.00 fee or adequate proof he cannot pay. / / / / / / FAILURE TO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.