OSRX, Inc. v. Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 OSRX, INC.; OCULAR SCIENCE, Case No. 23-cv-1131-BAS-DDL INC.,
ORDER:
Petitioners, (1) DENYING PETITIONERS’ v. OBJECTON TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING (ECF No. 9); HYMAN PHELPS & MACNAMARA,
P.C; KARLA L. PALMER
AND Respondents.
16 (2) DENYING RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF No. 12) 18 19 20 Pending before the Court are two motions. Petitioners OSRX, Inc. and Ocular Science, Inc. filed a motion to compel compliance with subpoenas issued to Respondents Karla Palmer and her firm Hyman Phelps & Macnamara. (ECF No. 1.) Magistrate Judge Leshner denied the petition. (ECF No. 6.) Petitioners then filed a motion objecting to Magistrate Judge Leshner’s ruling. (ECF No. 9.) Respondents filed a response in opposition to Petitioners’ objection which contained a motion for sanctions against Petitioners. (ECF No. 12.) Petitioners’ objection and Respondents’…