Hamman
Hamman v. Cava Group, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NEIL HAMMAN and MICHAEL Case No.: 22-cv-593-MMA (MSB) STEWART, individually and on behalf of 12 all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND Plaintiffs,
AMENDED COMPLAINT
14 v. [Doc. No. 31]
CAVA GROUP, INC.,
16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Defendant Cava Group, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Neil Hamman and Michael Stewart’s (“Plaintiffs”) Second Amended Complaint. Doc. No. 31. Plaintiffs filed an opposition, Doc. No. 35, and Defendant replied, Doc. No. 36. The Court found this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 37. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND In this putative class action, Plaintiffs allege that Defendant…