Holmes

Holmes v. Estock

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20233:16-cv-02458California1,116 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CHARLES HOLMES, Case No.: 16-cv-2458-MMA-BLM

Plaintiff, NOTICE AND ORDER PROVIDING v. TENTATIVE RULINGS RE: 14 DR. ESTOCK, et al., DAUBERT MOTIONS, MOTIONS IN LIMINE, AND OBJECTIONS Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 196, 200, 201]

18 19 On December 12, 2023, the parties in this action will appear before the Court for a final pretrial conference and hearing on Plaintiff’s Daubert motions, motions in limine, and objections to pretrial disclosures. See Doc. Nos. 196, 200, 201. In anticipation of the hearing, the Court issues the following tentative rulings on the pending motions and objections. PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS 1. The Court tentatively SUSTAINS Plaintiff’s pretrial objection to Defendants’ previously undisclosed witnesses. As Defendants have not responded to Plaintiff’s objections, the Court tentatively finds that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.