Kimbler

Kimbler v. Dexcom, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20233:22-cv-01867California1,284 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || DELVINA KIMBLER, Case No.: 22-cv-1867-JO-MMP Plaintiff, 13 |] Vv. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Id DEXCOM, INC. RECONSIDERATION Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Delvina Kimbler moves for reconsideration [Dkt. 27] of the Court’s Orde: ||denying Plaintiff's motion to remand this action to state court. Dkt. 25. For the reason: 22 || stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff?s request for reconsideration. 23 || /// /// 25 || /// 26 || /// \\/// 28 || ///

I. BACKGROUND On November 23, 2022, Plaintiff filed a products liability action against Defendant ||Dexcom, Inc., a citizen of California, in state court. Dkt. 6, Ex. A. On November 28, 4 || 2022, prior to receiving service of the complaint, Defendant filed a notice of removal on 5 || the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff then served…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.