Novalk, LLC v. Evanston Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20233:22-cv-01789California4,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NOVALK, LLC, Case No.: 22cv1789-JO(LR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY,

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION

et al., TO SUBSTITUTE EXPERT Defendants. WITNESSES AND MODIFY 16 SCHEDULING ORDER [ECF No. 35]

AND

(2) ISSUING AMENDED

SCHEDULING ORDER

REGULATING DISCOVERY AND

OTHER PRE-TRIAL POCEEDINGS 22 23 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Novalk LLC’s “Ex Parte Application to Substitute Expert Witnesses and Modify Scheduling Order Regarding Expert Witness Discovery Deadlines.” (ECF No. 35.) Defendant Evanston Insurance Company filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 36.) For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiff’s ex parte motion. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action arises from a dispute between Plaintiff and Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.